Jump to content

Soundings

Full Members
  • Posts

    667
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Soundings

  1. Well it did offend, me anyway, And yes JM did the decent thing and yes I agree with what you have just said for that is all this thread should reflect and should always have reflected - our joint sympathy and concern. I know we are all at one in that regard.

  2. Not sure anybody said he intended distress Strowie, indeed I said quite the opposite. It was just unfortunate and we all do that from time to time. I think JM has done the proper thing and all credit to him for that.

  3. Yes it does offend JM. The gory detail is not required; the point can be made with subtlety, if it really needs to be made at all. Most can work out possible scenarios (good or bad) for themselves. Sometimes it is best left that way imho.

    I feel for the owners and the pooch and just hope for the best possible outcome. That said, I am sure you mean well JM :-)

  4. Do that all the time here in Norfolk - get stuck behind overtaking lorries (or lorries in general) that is. Used to get aggravated but now see it as a fact of life. Lorries do not stick to motorways anyway so it is always going to happen somewhere unless of course we concrete over the entire country with three lane roads. That's my take on it anyway :-)

    Take your point re slip roads though.

  5.  

    Charlie I hear the A12 is to be made three lanes from Chelmsford to Colchester over the next few years. Might have to find a different way to Norfolk from here to avoid those roadworks if it ever happens.

    Is it really worth it! Colchester is only up the road from Chelmsford.

  6. Sometimes the prescription is not quite right, it is a huge mathematical challenge working out the lens requirement. Mine were fine but not quite as good as they could have been. Solution - a quick zap with laser and bingo!

     

    So, as grendal says, most problems are easily managed.

  7. Had replacement lens surgery about 18 months ago. Brilliant! Wife had it done a couple of months ago - brilliant(ish) but "getting better all the time" (should burst into song there). It is quick, painless and in my experience very much worthwhile.

    It is though an operation and there are always risks but then the same applies to crossing the road!

    • Like 1
  8. I never always had a car smellyloo and I cannot say that I was "well heeled". But we did have a tele and radio had been around for a long time. Give me a pint of beer and a chat with the locals in the pub anytime over sitting in front of a goggle box watching the likes of Coronation St and other rubbish. God man - even dominoes is better than Coronation St - at least one is using one's brain and interacting with others.

    • Like 1
  9. You are entitled to your opinions JM as are the rest of us. I was very close to the issue you initially raised and likewise I shall leave it at that. But yes I agree the RSPB's influent is something to be concerned about.

    • Like 1
  10. Greatplum, you are correct, It is isolated and it struggles. I hope I am wrong but I cannot see how it can survive financially in the longer term - unless some well healed individual(s) run it as a hobby. Like you I reckon there will be an appeal.

  11.  

    If my memory serves me correctly it was Natural England that was behind the "let the sea take over" non maintenance of hard defences between Happisburgh and Winterton. Though I am sure the RSPB would have welcomed such a move if it did not impact on membership revenue to much!

    Quite correct ChrisB and it was not a direct recommendation it was one of a series of options. It was no more in effect that an analysis where alternatives are slung up on a white board for further debate. Of course, a well now publisher got hold of it and....well that is history that is best left that way now. But it was nothing to do with the RSPB or there is no evidence that I have seen to suggest that, although it might fit some agendas to paint the picture that way. And I am no fan of RSPB.

  12. RE the petrol issue, down here in Dorset, we live not far from a Sainsburys , with a fuel station. There`s another sainsburys about 6 miles away in the outskirts of Poole, yet the one near us regularly charges at least 3p per litre MORE than the one near Poole. They`re both Sainsburys, so why the big difference in per litre charges?. It seems because our village is looked upon as "rural", and the other one is in a town, they must feel we are better off, and think we can afford to pay more?. It`s just another con, and i wonder if they do like Ian says (Senator) and keep ALL the 5p for carrier bags?.

    We have something similar here with Tesco. Stalham is always dearer than, for instance, the store at Blue Boar. The reason, apparently, is that the planning approval for the Stalham store took steps to ensure that a couple of local garages would not be forced out of business.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

For details of our Guidelines, please take a look at the Terms of Use here.