Jump to content

oldgregg

Tech Team
  • Posts

    1,911
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by oldgregg

  1. 5 minutes ago, JohnK said:

     


    If you’re going to create an iOS app I won’t.
    But if you’re only going to do Android then I’ll have a go at an iOS one.
    In reality mine would probably start as free as it won’t be great but no competition for you as most people don’t have both devices.

     

    I think I'd probably cover iOS.

    The way we build apps there is not actually much difference in effort to also deploy to iOS.

    • Like 1
  2. It's still an important market, it just doesn't have the market share it did.

    The stats show both major platforms increasing, but it's not that simple. We're talking about people who will actually BUY apps, rather than just owners of a device.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 17 minutes ago, JohnK said:

    Have you thought about how to get tide times? Read a website? Input tide tables? Rough approximation?

     

    Yes I have...

    If you'd like to see it on iOS, probably proposing a competitor isn't the best way forward :default_norty:

    • Haha 1
  4. This is where it gets complicated...

    To release an Android app would cost £25, as a one-off fee to set up a developer account. You can develop on Windows, Mac or Linux - A £100 PC would do the job.

    To release an iOS app would mean £79 a year as a developer, plus the development tools only work on a Mac. And some stuff only works on a real Mac, so you'd need one of those. Take the cheapest Mac Mini and spec it with 8GB of RAM to make it usable and you've just spent another £569. Let's assume that's got a five-year life span, so total cost over the five years of £964 (plus a bit for the developer cost going up). 

    Apple take a 40% cut, so realistically the iOS app would need to sell £350 a year just to cover costs... 

    And they wonder why they're losing market share.

    • Like 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, JohnK said:

    I’d buy it.

     

    What would you pay? I don't mean that in a capitalist way, but more what do you see as a sensible price? These things take time to build, obviously...

    An Android release would be easy, but it's harder to justify an iOS release because of the costs.

  6. The Ocean 30 wasn't a production Broom model per se, I think that's the problem.

    They did fit out some themselves, but they also supplied them as mouldings via sister company Aquafibre and thus there are probably more of those (and the centre cockpit 30's) around than Broom fitted out. For that reason I think they only consider models which were exclusively built by Broom as a 'proper' Broom.

    Broom as a boatbuilder are no more anyway, so it's all a bit irrelevant now.

    • Thanks 1
  7. 19 hours ago, JohnK said:

    I like that.
    Worth having some made, badged with NBN and sold in the shop?

     

    Would there be an appetite for this plus other bits as a mobile app?

    The other bits I would see as speed / compass / map, bridge heights and some sort of distance calculator.

  8. 1 hour ago, ranworthbreeze said:

    I thought the Haines boats used the Broom hulls, but IMHO fitted out better.

    Haines use some 'old' Broom moulds, some generic Aquafibre moulds, some of their own design (the Haines 400) and some from others (Alphacraft in the past, and now Ferry Marina for the Haines 26).

    When Aquafibre went under, Haines acquired the moulds they needed and the production Broom stuff went to Brundall.

    I think it is generally considered that the Haines fitout is better these days, I've heard it referred to as "like Broom used to be".

    • Like 1
  9. 1 hour ago, rightsaidfred said:

    I was given to understand Brooms were building Barnes Brinkcraft`s 40ft plus boats while Sheerline were doing the smaller ones as Barnes no longer have room to build themselves having built holiday homes on what was part of the shed they were using.

    Fred

    I think part of the reason is that Broom were building them for less than Brinks could.. Why they're prepared to build so cheap is probably a different story. They've also built a private one which also has that daft helm seat.

    It's Silverline who build the smaller models.

  10. Yeah, this seems to be what is happening at Broom.

    Haines can't build enough boats at the moment, so the market is there.

    Seems odd when it's such a major brand as Broom, but I guess taking on the business requires skill whereas putting houses on it does not.

    • Like 1
  11. 2 hours ago, Chelsea14Ian said:

    I think there hire fleet is closer to 12 or 13.During the season we top up with fuel and water.For sure where there hire fleet are based you could not moor 20 plus  boats.

    It's not the biggest dyke, certainly. 12 or 13 sounds more like it, though the boat at the end has now moved on so there's slightly more room.

  12. What I don't get is who is going to build and develop their hirefleet going forward...

    It was always a way of showcasing the business and the models available, and developing new models is an expensive business.

    Something still doesn't add up.

    • Like 3
  13. 47 minutes ago, ranworthbreeze said:

    Most of the current syndicate have some age on them, there is the new syndicate boat Endeavor 11 but this is also based at Broom's.

    Endeavour has been around for a while and sits in between Thunder and Lightning in age (Thunder is 1997, Lightning is 1994 and Endeavour is 1995). 

    She's fitted to a high standard but the interior finish is very much of its time and some of the ex-hire boats have potentially aged better. Also, a share is more than double the price of the Shadow boats.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

For details of our Guidelines, please take a look at the Terms of Use here.