JennyMorgan Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/parking_eye_s_time_at_whitlingham_could_be_over_1_3985283 I'm given to understand that Norwich's 'dogging' community could be wagging their tails over this one! That aside Parking Eye have done nothing to raise the profile of Whitlingham's redundant gravel pits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 Well that's very good news. Nice to see that some mistakes do get admitted and corrected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted March 10, 2015 Author Share Posted March 10, 2015 I wonder if Parking Eye's apparent willingness to pull out early has anything to do with the government decision to allow ten minutes grace before drivers are 'fined' for staying stay too long in council owned car parking spaces? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timbo Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 It it just me wondering why out of £190,000 in parking fees and fines nobody considered buying a 3'x4' shed and employing a carpark warden, to carry out a less draconian system, and bring in more visitors and therefore more money to the park? Just think of all the fun the Broads Authority could have rebranding the shed... The WHO or Whittlingham Holistic Operation, how about the CPO or Car Park Operations. GCHQ Good Carparking Head Quarters? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranworthbreeze Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 I wonder if Parking Eye's apparent willingness to pull out early has anything to do with the government decision to allow ten minutes grace before drivers are 'fined' for staying stay too long in council owned car parking spaces? Hi Peter,I am not sure that Parking Eye are willing to get out of the contract they have had for almost ten years.We know the amount they made in fines in the last year but does anyone know what they have charged the Broads Authority for the right to to impose their fines?I agree with Tim's suggestion that a couple of men in a shed on shifts would cost the BA next to nothing and would complement the staff that already work in the visitors centre & cafe assumming these are currently manned and not hit by pointless cutbacks.RegardsAlan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExMemberBobdog Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 I'm given to understand that Norwich's 'dogging' community could be wagging their tails over this one! I wonder if Parking Eye's apparent willingness to pull out early ... Was the innuendo deliberate? Well done anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imtamping2 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 Was the innuendo deliberate? Well done anyway Yes I agree , there seems to be a pattern forming especially if you include the 3 wishes on Oulton... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/parking_eye_s_contract_is_to_end_early_at_whitlingham_country_park_following_complaints_1_3999921 Common sense rules! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.