JennyMorgan Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 https://mailchi.mp/a10c5f0886df/broads-briefing-november?e=259d8798cf If you look carefully at the picture relating to the Broads Engage Workshop then you will see my back side! My front side is intently facing the screen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paladin Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Genuine question, were you told you were being photographed and that the photo would be published? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted November 16, 2018 Author Share Posted November 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Paladin said: Genuine question, were you told you were being photographed and that the photo would be published? No, although I understand this might not be allowed in the future if JP's proposed draconian controls are introduced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paladin Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Yes, this seems like blatant double-standards to me. In their proposed 'Unreasonable Complainant Policy', one of the actions under the heading of "unreasonable complainant behaviour" is "Photographing or filming the Authority’s staff without their permission..." It's a case of don't do as I do, do as I tell you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted November 16, 2018 Author Share Posted November 16, 2018 7 minutes ago, Paladin said: Yes, this seems like blatant double-standards to me. In their proposed 'Unreasonable Complainant Policy', one of the actions under the heading of "unreasonable complainant behaviour" is "Photographing or filming the Authority’s staff without their permission..." It's a case of don't do as I do, do as I tell you. This would appear to be completely at odds with Press freedoms for one thing, even Mrs May is above & beyond the protection that JP is demanding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairTmiddlin Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 As far as I can ascertain this is the law as it stands It is an offence under the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 to publish or communicate a photograph of a constable (not including PCSOs), a member of the armed forces, or a member of the security services If you intend to sell your photography it’s important to know the difference between editorial and commercial usage. Editorial use means that a picture can be used to illustrate an article, story or educational text, but not to sell a product or promote something. Commercial use means that a picture can be used to sell a product, promote something, or raise money for a cause. Stand on public property If you and your subject are standing on public property, generally you do not need permission to take a picture of them – but there are a few exceptions. If your subject is engaged in a personal or private activity (such as leaving a hospital) you need to respect their privacy. If you plan on selling your work, these ‘people’ shots can only be used for editorial purposes Nothing in law that prohibits the posting on Social Media, any photographic media of a Broads Ranger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted November 16, 2018 Author Share Posted November 16, 2018 1 hour ago, FairTmiddlin said: Nothing in law that prohibits the posting on Social Media, any photographic media of a Broads Ranger. Or even a BA CEO!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paladin Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 1 hour ago, FairTmiddlin said: As far as I can ascertain this is the law as it stands It is an offence under the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 to publish or communicate a photograph of a constable (not including PCSOs), a member of the armed forces, or a member of the security services Only if that photograph is "likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MauriceMynah Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Isn't publishing photographs of JennyMorgan's backside an act of terrorism in it's own right? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted November 17, 2018 Author Share Posted November 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, MauriceMynah said: Isn't publishing photographs of JennyMorgan's backside an act of terrorism in it's own right? Its a very nice backside, I'm quite attached to it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MauriceMynah Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 This subject is one I am not qualified to make further comment on Peter, as to do so, would require me to have to look into it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanessan Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 23 minutes ago, MauriceMynah said: This subject is one I am not qualified to make further comment on Peter, as to do so, would require me to have to look into it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted November 17, 2018 Author Share Posted November 17, 2018 11 hours ago, MauriceMynah said: This subject is one I am not qualified to make further comment on Peter, as to do so, would require me to have to look into it. Enter the darkside at your own risk! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.