Thingamybob, you are quite right & I agree with you entirely. However, your response does raise a few concerns. For many, one of my daughters included, being a liveaboard is the only rational solution to what really is a national disgrace. My daughter, like so many, can only get zero hours contracts meaning that even with enough saved for a deposit she is finding that getting her own home is next to impossible. The Broads Authority had a solution that would have helped many, Jenner's Basin on Thorpe Island, it won't be happening. Planning policies are so often against those on low incomes seeking a home. Financial policies are against those seeking a home. Employment policies too, it is a disgrace because the solution is there. There is so much redundant land around the Broads, unsuitable for housing because of flooding issues which could be ideal for formal liveaboard communities, however birds take precedence over humans, the system & societies' priorities are flawed. The average local wage is under the national average, so often the only folk who can afford local properties are people from outside the area. You ask that liveaboards play by the rules. Mooring prices are based on what folk are prepared to pay, or are able to pay but liveaboards can rarely afford marina charges. My daughter, like many others, wants to provide for herself, but the system just won't allow her to. Providing for liveaboards should be a national project and not just because of need but also because it would, in part, take the pressure off greenfield sites. Liveaboards have a place on the Broads, we should embrace them as part of the rich mix that makes the Broads the Broads.