Jump to content

Flood Barrier


MaceSwinger

Recommended Posts

Such a barrier has been considered and reconsidered and yet again reconsidered so many times during my lifetime! Firstly, the major flooding we have seen on the Waveney Valler recently is fresh rather than saltwater. Secondly, a number of renowned and able experts have repeatedly concluded that if the sea is held back at Yarmouth Southtown then the likelihood of saltwater flooding above Potter will increase quite considerably. I am no expert but I do see the logic of that conclusion.  Still, yet even more research will give a purpose and employment to a few good folk I suppose!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, riverman said:

In the short term, they would be far better off mitigating for extreme weather rather than extreme tides

As has been well proved in recent years, when the Thames Barrier was useless against the rainwater flooding which devastated the Thames valley above London.  See also, the Somerset Levels.

I remember all the debate about a flood barrier back in the 70s and in the end it was decided not to build one, mainly out of fear of what all the "experts" would then decide to do with it.

"Why don't we use it to control the tides and raise the water level by 4 inches?"  Or if you are a farmer rather than a birdwatcher : "Why don't we lower the level by 4 inches?"  We have all seen in recent flooding, what a difference 4 inches makes, on the upper reaches!

I think quite enough damage has been done by the "experts" who constrained the rivers with excessively high banks, largely to appease the farmers.  If you build a barrier across Yarmouth Haven, you can be certain that all the various factions of the Flat Earth Society will very soon start buggering about with it!

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday morning before EDP published the Barrier idea DEFRA chose to re-publish the 2015 River Basin Management Plans for the period 2015-2020 They contain some interesting information

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/river-basin-management-plans-2015?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=govuk-notifications&utm_source=0612970e-2a71-4d17-bd9c-abc400d30cb6&utm_content=daily#anglian-river-basin-district-rbmp:-2015

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vaughan said:

 If you build a barrier across Yarmouth Haven, you can be certain that all the various factions of the Flat Earth Society will very soon start buggering about with it!

I rather fear the 'control freak'.

Granted that the Broads themselves are man made but most of the rivers are basically natural. The Broads is the Broads, messing around with nature inevitably has a knock on effect.

I can't help but believe that there is a high degree of self importance rearing its unwelcome head with this latest 'initiative'. 

Heaven save us from such as Natural England, witness the Hoveton Great Broad debacle. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Thames barrier was part of a system to protect London and downstream tidal areas which it does very well. 
raised flood walls and Barking creek flood barrier. 
The upper Thames is a separate scheme. 
But the same problems apply to the upper river areas if a barrier is used

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Sponsors

    Norfolk Broads Network is run by volunteers - You can help us run it by making a donation

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

For details of our Guidelines, please take a look at the Terms of Use here.