MauriceMynah Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 When I was a lad, we used to hire boats from Blakes, and the catalog advertising the boats always had a small footnote along the lines of... "This boat will not normally pass under Potter Heigham bridge". I assume that Hoseasons brochure was much the same. I've just looked at a boat in an on-line brochure but this info wasn't there. May I ask the hire fleet people here why this info seems to have disappeared? Ok, I know the correct answer to that question should be "Yes you may"... so... Why has this info seemed to have disappeared? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Perhaps since so many boats now won't pass under Potter Bridge, or even Beccles for that matter, then maybe the footnote should now read 'this boat might pass under Potter Heigham Bridge, if you are lucky with the tides'. In my time with a boatyard we had more grief than a little with claims that a boat would/wouldn't pass under that bridge so I can understand it if the brochures have dropped that footnote. No claims equals no liability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Interesting question, but on a related point can anyone advise if this 'boat' would get under Potter Heigham? http://www.eadt.co.uk/business/mark_the_date_the_world_s_biggest_container_ship_the_cscl_globe_is_coming_to_felixstowe_next_month_1_3877161 With canopy down of course. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonRascal Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 You’re quite right at first I thought it may be that if it said nothing it meant it could pass under all bridges – so I searched for boats clearly too high to and again it is silent upon the fact the boat in practice could not pass under Wroxham Bridge let alone Potter Heigham. Poor show that because someone new to boating would have no idea, merrily book the boat and then have a look at places to visit perhaps the Rising Sun at Coltishall, only to find on arrival at the boatyard they can’t get under this bridge... I was also surprised with Herbert Woods, in their latest brochure their ‘Loweliner’ Aqua Fibre molded boats are now said not to be able to pass under Beccles Old bridge. I know it was very rare but they were ‘designed’ when new, to pass under Potter Heigham bridge. With that increasingly only passable within a select few boats it is curious Herbert Woods feel a boat able to pass under Wroxham Bridge cannot pass under Beccles old bridge and yet the same design from other yards apparently still can. I have to say Richardson's is very good in giving information about bridges - even going so far as to making the point that a boat's interior may be exposed to the elements (for example a centre cokpit) when passing under a low bridge as the canopy has to be retracted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawsOrca Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Interesting question, but on a related point can anyone advise if this 'boat' would get under Potter Heigham? http://www.eadt.co.uk/business/mark_the_date_the_world_s_biggest_container_ship_the_cscl_globe_is_coming_to_felixstowe_next_month_1_3877161 With canopy down of course. Samuel.. I don't think that boat will get under it.. but it will certainly get through it followed by the rest of us! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Re Lowliners passing under Beccles Bridge & going up to Geldeston, maybe the problem is not so much height but bulk. Turning one of those outside The Locks would be an interesting spectacle! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonRascal Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Ok sorry to continue our drift off topic, we are experiencing a beam on sea today. The Daily Mail (Yes I know that very trusted source of reliable information) says the The CSCL Globe is 1,312 ft long, 192 ft wide and 100 ft deep, making it the world's largest container ship. It is splitting hairs because the previous record holder - the Maersk Triple E class - are also 1,312 ft long slightly wider at 194 ft and but 52 ft less draft. None of these new record breakers cane navigate the Panama Canal due to their massive drafts and as China continues to slide on manufacturing output I wonder if these vast ships will continue to be required for the volume of containers coming out of the far east.. I note nowhere does it says it is not able to pass under Potter Heigham Bridge As for Lowliners at The Locks - the 'Lad's Week' goes there bi-annually with two 46 footers. The key is to reverse out. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 The key is to reverse out. Or in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stumpy Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Robin - from my days boarding on arrival - box ships measure on capacity, CSCL Globe is 19000 TEUs (Twenty foot Equivalent Units), Maersk E class are 18720 ( I think) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oddfellow Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 I have no idea why Blakeseasons isn't showing this info. It is poor show and will lead rise to complaints, I am sure. Our web site indicates whether a boat will or won't pass. It leads rise to questions about how much navigation is restricted, but isn't a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Or in Spoil sports! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffbroadslover Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Another snippet of information that used to be in the brochures many moons ago was the interior headroom for each boat. Some even had details of how long the beds were. I am wondering if brochure producers think we have all got shorter than we were or does it not matter nowadays? Judging by the number of times I read "the bed wasn't big enough" it seems we have not got any shorter! Maybe we are expected to enquire using the Freedom of Information legislation !! Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oddfellow Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 We are occasionally asked about bed sizes and less frequently about head room . We have never been quite organised enough to store it in a simple system and measure it each time! If people would like it put on the web site, let me know and we'll build it in to the next site revamp. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MauriceMynah Posted December 9, 2014 Author Share Posted December 9, 2014 Can't say fairer than that Andy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Samuel: Yep, that little boat would go through PH rather than under it. Moreover it would take out those flipping bridges at GY and do us all a favour. Regards. Bonzo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadScot Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Down with bridges I say...errrr or should that be up??? Iain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clive Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Richardsons brochure tells you whether or not their boats will go under bridges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MauriceMynah Posted December 10, 2014 Author Share Posted December 10, 2014 I couldn't see it on the on-line page I was looking at. Could be me though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Essential equipment for dealing with Potter Heigham Bridge: 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Suggested new design for Potter Heigham Bridge after demolition. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Thus Hickling will lose its exclusivity and attraction when it is overrun by the hoi polloi! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclemike Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 thought the hoi polloi were the ones already using hickling 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Oh dear. Joke? yes? Bonzo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 Yes, tongue in cheek, as one might expect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 The best bit of the Broads IMHO. Unfortunately (some may say) Potter Heigham Bridge does not stop this member of the hoi polloi from getting there. The boat goes under with ease at any state of the tide. I love it up there and always spend a few days of my trip enjoying its splendour. When you come to think of it, Barton Broad is not ruined by "hoi polloi" and we can all get there. : Bonzo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.