MauriceMynah Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 26 minutes ago, JennyMorgan said: Surroundings as in The Broads, excluding the tacky delights of Wroxham or Gt Yarmouth! Sorry Peter but again I must lock horns. What the quoted post rather implies is that any modern design is fine as long as it's similar to the bits you like! That ain't gonna cut the mustard with anyone at Dragonfly house, and ultimately, they're the people who will be making the decisions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minifer Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 11 minutes ago, Vaughan said: Well sorry, but I can't! If that has something to do with sailing, I wouldn't know if it was on starboard tack or port. It's starboard, goose-winging on the run in my view! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaughan Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 In which case, I shall pass clear to leeward of it! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendel Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 27 minutes ago, Vaughan said: I wouldn't know if it was on starboard tack or port. probably on ticky tack 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lulu Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 I quite like the first design, but looks to be way too big for the site 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted June 19, 2018 Author Share Posted June 19, 2018 49 minutes ago, Lulu said: I quite like the first design, but looks to be way too big for the site It would also be at the expense of quite a few mooring spaces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 5 hours ago, JennyMorgan said: It would also be at the expense of quite a few mooring spaces. It's difficult to tell from design drawings, the actual size of the proposed building, but I wouldn't imagine it would have a frontage of much more than 30 or 40 metres. Which, these days, probably amounts to three or four boat lengths at most. I don't know how much of the present mooring space, will actually be available as B.A. moorings, but there must be about 200 metres along there, including the old 'Curtiss Store', at the moment. So, even with the new building, there would be plenty of room for at least a dozen mooring spaces. Who knows, the building could perhaps be 'set back' from the riverside a little and allow mooring along it's frontage. Bearing in mind also, there are several hundred yards of bank space almost opposite, where boats are often moored. When you add on the moorings at 'The Bridge' pub and the boatyards, the Acle bridge area would seem to be quite well endowed with mooring spaces, when compared to many other places. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnks34 Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 9 hours ago, EastCoastIPA said: I feel some how very uncomfortable at the BA building a visitor centre right opposite a site where they turned down proposals by The Broadland Boating Company for glamping pods which would have accommodated visitors!!!! Anyone been past the WRC recently and seen the way the glamping pods and yurts are proliferating there? Now obviously someone knows how to play the system and the other is very new to the game, but the BA do not need to rub the new kid on the blocks nose in it. Perhaps the BA should go back to being the planning authority and let some one else do the building? I wonder how many people didn't even bother looking at the Acle Bridge site because they thought planning would be such a pain in the you know what and therefore not worth the bother. For the BA to come along and over develop the site would be very bad form in my eyes. Im not really all that sure I want them as a planning authority either but I can agree with what your saying! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted June 19, 2018 Author Share Posted June 19, 2018 Thanks for your reply, Kingfisher666. All fair comments but please consider that the site was purchased in order to provide moorings and I have no doubt that it was financed out of tolls money. More than once I have passed through Acle without being able to find a mooring so I do feel precious about those three or four moorings that we could potentially lose. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 13 minutes ago, JennyMorgan said: More than once I have passed through Acle without being able to find a mooring so I do feel precious about those three or four moorings that we could potentially lose. It's a good job you didn't want to moor in Horning. You'd probably still be searching for that elusive mooring... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnks34 Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 The artists impression shows the building directly at the waters edge so I would think there would be no moorings to the building frontage. Im pretty sure they might think boats would spoil the view anyway. To me it looks like a Viking Long House. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted June 19, 2018 Author Share Posted June 19, 2018 1 hour ago, kingfisher666 said: It's a good job you didn't want to moor in Horning. You'd probably still be searching for that elusive mooring... Shhhhh, don't let on but I moor at the sailing club! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trambo Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 I started by not liking the idea or the designs but the concept in growing on me. I personally find the Bure upstream of the bridge to be a little unattractive anyway and perhaps a landmark building will become an asset to the area. After all we all now love (don't we) the vandalism of putting a wind pump (or is it a mill) in the middle of a historical gateway. Good job there weren't Broads Forums then! Of the three designs I find number two the most attractive and certainly the most original. Number one looks out of scale. OK for a smaller building but just doesn't look right at this size. Design three immediately made me think it was a spare chunk of the de Young museum in the Golden Gate Park and would just not sit comfortably at all in the Broadland landscape. Fred 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffbroadslover Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 I would like to see the response if a private individual were to submit any of these three designs as a request for planning permission for a private dwelling !!! Jeff 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnks34 Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 If it turns out to be a white elephant it could always be sold off for residential 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendel Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 8 hours ago, dnks34 said: To me it looks like a Viking Long House. well only in as much as it is long, a true longhouse would have crossed end beams, a lower pitch on the roof and either a thatched roof or turfs. how do I know - I once built a 32 foot viking longhouse for re-enactment that went to shows at Maldon and Lindisfarne. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MauriceMynah Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 I bet you're grateful that Gustave Eiffel never picked a fight with anyone.! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendel Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 and just to prove it I have evidence - now this would make a nice teaching space, 30 odd kids at a time, and we bought it off with a budget of under £1000 by buying the 'thatch' from the film makers of Robin Hood (it had only had one of the stuntmen fall through it - it was in 3m wide panels held together with wire twisted through), now I reckon I could still knock up something similar under about £3000 for the Acle site. 8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQ Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 11 hours ago, trambo said: I started by not liking the idea or the designs but the concept in growing on me. I personally find the Bure upstream of the bridge to be a little unattractive anyway and perhaps a landmark building will become an asset to the area. After all we all now love (don't we) the vandalism of putting a wind pump (or is it a mill) in the middle of a historical gateway. Good job there weren't Broads Forums then! Of the three designs I find number two the most attractive and certainly the most original. Number one looks out of scale. OK for a smaller building but just doesn't look right at this size. Design three immediately made me think it was a spare chunk of the de Young museum in the Golden Gate Park and would just not sit comfortably at all in the Broadland landscape. Fred When that mill was built there were still buildings along the river edge there, including a pub, it was still a busy area... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JennyMorgan Posted June 20, 2018 Author Share Posted June 20, 2018 http://www.broadsnationalpike.com/2018/06/landmark-deb-acle.html 1 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 10 hours ago, dnks34 said: If it turns out to be a white elephant it could always be sold off for residential If? Or When 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshman Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Not surprising that James has something to say!! Talking of which I saw his yurts the other day - no wonder the BA were not that keen!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 27 minutes ago, marshman said: Talking of which I saw his yurts the other day - no wonder the BA were not that keen!! Loved the video proving to the B.A. that the yurts weren't fixed and were in fact 'portable'. Seven grown men lifting the thing up and staggering around with it. Couldn't help thinking they should have speeded the video up slightly and set it to some 'Benny Hill' music... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 3 hours ago, grendel said: and just to prove it I have evidence - now this would make a nice teaching space, 30 odd kids at a time, and we bought it off with a budget of under £1000 by buying the 'thatch' from the film makers of Robin Hood (it had only had one of the stuntmen fall through it - it was in 3m wide panels held together with wire twisted through), now I reckon I could still knock up something similar under about £3000 for the Acle site. If it was anything like the school I went to, you'd have to make sure you confiscated the kids ciggies & matches, before letting them anywhere near it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaughan Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 50 minutes ago, marshman said: Not surprising that James has something to say!! Who says that James had anything to do it? I thought it was a laugh a line and demonstrated the best value of satire when wishing to make a point. I particularly enjoyed "The Spirit of Boredom", "Horsefly House" and "The bastard offspring of a moth and a wherry"! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.